UniList currently publishes catalog identity and navigation fields. Publisher ranking, salary, and employment fields remain withheld until retained redistribution approvals are reviewed and committed.
Community reports remain separate from institutional facts and appear only after source-level review.
[read the full methodology →]SOURCES
Financial Times owns and documents these ranking and outcome fields. UniList does not expose them without retained redistribution approval. Consult Financial Times directly for its current data and methodology.
QS owns and documents these ranking fields. UniList does not expose them without retained redistribution approval. Consult QS directly for its current data and methodology.
The legacy extraction did not retain exact source URLs and access dates for every field. Those values are not rendered as facts and cannot enter insights or MCP answers.
# Publication requires a direct source URL, publisher, source date, access date, review state, and field-level provenance.
Collection uses Reddit's approved OAuth Data API. No usernames are retained. A claim needs at least two active sources, confidence of 70% or more, and explicit editorial publication before it can appear.
# Live collection and publication remain inactive until Reddit approves UniList API access.
Manual research is publishable only after the exact supporting page and access date are stored with the field.
# No legacy manual label is accepted as proof by itself.
report issues: GitHub issue tracker